“The key to planning and implementing the right litigation, compliance, and privacy strategy is to develop and maintain a strong partnership with our clients.
Clients seek out Tiffany for her successful track record in defending class action claims on behalf of clients in a broad range of industries, including technology, healthcare, and consumer product companies.
Tiffany leads high-stakes class actions at the cutting edge of innovation and technology. She has a successful track record of defending industry-leading clients in their most complex class actions. She also has advised extensively on privacy matters, unfair business practice claims and consumer advertising issues. Tiffany is a former co-chair of MoFo’s global Litigation Department and the firm’s Complex Litigation + Advisement Practice Group.
The Daily Journal named Tiffany to its 2023 list of Top Women Lawyers and listed her as a 2023 Leading Commercial Litigator in California. Chambers USA 2025 again ranked her in commercial litigation, while The Legal 500 2024 again recommended her in product liability and marketing and advertising. Lawdragon named Tiffany on its 2025 list of 100 Leading AI & Legal Tech Advisors. BTI Consulting Group has recognized Tiffany as one of a small group of attorneys nationwide who represent the “absolute best of the best” in the area of client service. Her clients include leaders in the technology, healthcare, financial services, and retail sectors.
Experience
Obtained complete dismissal with prejudice of all claims in a class action asserting claims under the federal and California state wiretapping statutes. Plaintiff alleged that the client violated wiretapping laws when the text messaging platform unlawfully “intercepted” confidential communications sent by individuals to the client’s celebrity clients. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the decision.
Defended client and its affiliates in five separate privacy class actions related to two popular dating apps. The litigation chiefly asserted claims under Illinois’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA).
Defending client in a class action asserting RICO, fraud, and a range of state law claims alleging that the client improperly obtained rate increases for its services.
Representing client in a putative class action involving allegations that defendant developed and released generative AI systems that allegedly violate copyright laws.
Represented a cloud-based software company in a putative class action filed under the California Consumer Privacy Act, alleging that the company was responsible for a data security incident on its e-commerce platform that resulted in the improper disclosure of consumers’ personal information.
Representing technology company in consumer class actions pending in courts around the country, challenging, among other things, recruitment practices, cancellation fees, and sending texts to consumers. In one of these matters, achieved a ruling in favor of defendant after a bench trial.
Represented a consumer electronics manufacturer in class action involving alleged violations of the Wiretap Act and unfair competition claims. Defeated class certification and achieved summary judgment in favor of defendant, which was affirmed by the Ninth Circuit.