The first decision, Kearney & Co. v. U.S., explores the ability of contractors to use labor mapping to bridge differences between an agency's stated needs and a contractor's offerings under its U.S. General Services Administration federal supply schedule contracts.
The second details GAO jurisdiction over a combined competition for cash prizes and a small business innovative research, or SBIR, contract.
The third reaffirms the importance of agencies understanding what a contractor is offering.
Read the full blog post.
