Morrison Foerster is an international law firm with lawyers practicing throughout the United States, Asia, and Europe. Click to discover more.

mofo_share_image.jpg

Morrison Foerster

common-default.jpeg

Terms / Notices

Cookies

Privacy Policy

Reporting Hotline

Attorney Advertising

Alumni

  Linkedin

MoFo LinkedIN

  Facebook

MoFo Facebook

YouTube

MoFo Youtube

Morrison Foerster - Footer

Implications of the Fifth Circuit's In re Ultra Petroleum Corp. Decision

You have not solved the recaptcha challenge yet or session expired, try again.

Email Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Unsolicited e-mails and information sent to Morrison Foerster will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others pursuant to our <a href="https://www.mofo.com/about/privacy-policy.html">Privacy Policy</a>, may not receive a response, and do not create an attorney-client relationship with Morrison Foerster. If you are not already a client of Morrison Foerster, do not include any confidential information in this message. Also, please note that our attorneys do not seek to practice law in any jurisdiction in which they are not properly authorized to do so.

Feedback

mofo-logo-2022.svg

People

Capabilities

Resources

About

Culture

Offices

Careers

Stay Connected

On October 14th, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit released its latest decision in the In re Ultra Petroleum Corp. case, providing important precedent after decades of significant split in authority on two

We are Morrison Foerster — a global firm of exceptional credentials. Our clients include some of the largest financial institutions, investment banks, and Fortune 100, technology, and life sciences companies. Our lawyers are committed to achieving innovative and business-minded results for our clients, while preserving the differences that make us stronger.Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

About Morrison Foerster

people-default-header-desktop.jpg

people-default-header-mobile.jpg

Default Meta Data

On October 14th, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit released its latest decision in the In re Ultra Petroleum Corp. case, providing important precedent after decades of significant split in authority on two hotly debated and oft-litigated issues: the enforceability of yield maintenance (or “make-whole”) premiums in Chapter 11 cases and the appropriate rate to use in calculating a creditor’s entitlement to post-petition interest.<a href="https://media2.mofo.com/v3/assets/blt5775cc69c999c255/blta6290475cbec94cd/6352f54964e87d5f88c53ff6/221021-implications-of-the-fifth-circuits.pdf" target="_self">Read our analysis in Law360</a>.

Implications of the Fifth Circuit's In re Ultra Petroleum Corp. Decision

Sign Up

Theresa Foudy serves as co-chair of the firm’s Distressed Real Estate Group and has over 25 years of experience representing clients in a wide range of complex commercial litigation, including class-action securities fraud, accounting fraud, white-collar criminal matters, and general commercial disputes. Theresa also has a particular focus in bankruptcy litigation and she has represented Chapter 11 debtors, creditors’ committees, indenture trustees, secured and unsecured creditors, private equity sponsors, independent directors, and distressed investors in all stages of bankruptcy.Throughout her career, Theresa has worked on many of the United States’ largest and most complex bankruptcy cases, including serving as lead trial counsel in several of the most prominent bankruptcy matters of the last decade. She has advised clients on all types of bankruptcy-related disputes, including suits by or against bankrupt companies, investigations into what led to bankruptcy filings, avoidance actions, and litigation of reorganization plans.Theresa’s representative high-profile matters include: serving as lead trial counsel for wholly owned subsidiaries of a multinational commodity trading and mining company as defendants in a four-day bench trial concerning the rejection of a lease to a power plant in an adversary proceeding before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas; serving as lead trial counsel for defendant directors in a 15-day bench trial on a creditors’ committee’s motion for standing to assert claims for breach of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the directors’ approval of a merger transaction and, after prevailing in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, handling the successful defense of subsequent appeals by the creditors’ committee to the District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; and defending a private equity sponsor against clawback claims seeking over $350 million in dividends and management fees.Theresa also has extensive experience in general commercial, appellate, and criminal litigation. She has represented clients in connection with contract disputes, commercial torts, and accounting fraud and malpractice suits in state and federal courts, as well as in arbitration. In addition, prior to entering private practice, she argued over 100 appeals to New York Appellate Division First Department, New York Court of Appeals, and Second Circuit Court of Appeals as a member of the Appeals Bureau for the New York County District Attorney’s Office and the Office’s Civil Litigation Coordinator.Theresa’s exceptional litigation skills, widely recognized by The Legal 500, Best Lawyers and Super Lawyers, are complemented by her role on the Thomson Reuters Practical Law Bankruptcy Advisory Board.<h4>Representative Experience</h4><h5>Bankruptcy Litigation</h5><ul><li>In re Thrasio Holdings, Inc., et al. (Bankr. D.N.J.) Counsel to the official committee of unsecured creditors of Thrasio Holdings, Inc. and its affiliated debtors in their chapter 11 cases. Thrasio is an acquisition entrepreneurship company that focuses on acquiring and scaling businesses within the Amazon third-party seller ecosystem.</li><li>Toys “R” Us Litigation Trust v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. (Bankr. E.D. Virginia). Successfully obtained summary judgment for the defendant dismissing a $12 million, plus interest, preference claim brought by plaintiff litigation trustee.</li><li>In re Clovis Oncology, Inc., et al. (Bankr. Del.) Counsel to the official committee of unsecured creditors of Clovis Oncology, Inc., and its affiliated debtors in their chapter 11 cases. Clovis is a biopharmaceutical company focused on acquiring, developing, and commercializing cancer treatments in the United States and abroad. Clovis filed for chapter 11 to implement a sale of their assets pursuant to section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code.</li><li>In re GVS Portfolio I B, LLC (Bankr. D. Del.). As counsel to a secured junior mezzanine lender, obtained dismissal of a Chapter 11 case filed by a mezzanine borrower as a bad faith filing following an evidentiary hearing.</li><li>In re Great Value Storage, et al. (Bankr. N.D. Tex.). As counsel to secured creditors holding over $300 million in debt in the Chapter 11 cases of a company with a portfolio of 64 self-storage facilities, prosecuted a numerous contested matters, including a motion to appoint a Chapter 11 trustee.</li><li>In re Valaris plc, et al. (Bankr. S.D. Tex.). Counsel to the official committee of unsecured creditors of Valaris plc and its affiliated debtors in their Chapter 11 cases. Valaris is a leading provider of offshore drilling services to the international oil and gas industry. It currently operates the industry’s largest modern offshore drilling fleet of 67 rigs, and maintains drilling operations in nearly every major offshore market spanning 24 countries. Valaris’s customers include many of the leading national and international oil companies, in addition to numerous local and independent offshore exploration and production companies. The company listed total assets of approximately $13 billion and total debts of approximately $7.85 billion in its first day filings.</li><li>Counsel to an ad hoc group of holders of bonds issued and/or guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (“constitutional debt”) in connection with the first restructuring proceeding under the newly enacted Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act. Working in coordination with other holders of constitutional debt, the ad hoc group has engaged in targeted litigation and efforts to negotiate a plan for the Commonwealth’s restructuring, while simultaneously defending attempts to invalidate more than $6 billion of the Commonwealth’s $18 billion of outstanding constitutional debt.</li><li>Lead trial counsel for defendant directors in 15-day bench trial on motion of the official committee of unsecured creditors for standing to assert claims against directors for breach of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty in connection with their approval of a merger transaction. After prevailing in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, also handled successful defense of subsequent appeals by the creditors' committee to the District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.</li><li>Conflicts counsel for plaintiff Chapter 11 debtor, a leading provider of residential mortgages. Participated in all aspects of litigation and trial of adversary proceeding against junior secured noteholders.</li><li>Lead trial counsel for a creditor, a state-owned oil and natural gas company, in an evidentiary hearing in connection with a motion to dismiss bankruptcy case pending in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida.</li><li>Lead trial counsel for defendant, an alternative investment manager, in a 16-day bench trial of creditors' committee complaint seeking equitable subordination, re-characterization, and disallowance of transferee noteholders' claims in adversary proceeding pending in Chapter 11 case in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.</li><li>Conflicts counsel for an official committee of unsecured creditors in contested evidentiary hearing on debtors' motion to extend exclusivity in Chapter 11 cases pending in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.</li><li>Represented co-chair of an official committee of unsecured creditors for a global paper and packaging company during a contested confirmation hearing, in which equity holders challenged the valuation of a bankruptcy estate in cases pending in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.</li><li>Argued before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of plaintiff, a global financial services firm, in defense of summary judgment motion brought by defendant, a financial services multinational, seeking dismissal of claims for actual fraudulent conveyance arising from the client issuing a guarantee to defendant of billions of dollars of intraday exposure days before filing for bankruptcy.</li><li>Briefed and argued, on behalf of plaintiff, an institutional lender, as a trustee for the holders of $250 million in senior secured notes, oppositions to motion to dismiss complaint and amended complaint alleging breach of contract claims against junior noteholders for violations of an intercreditor agreement in Chapter 11 cases pending in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.</li><li>Briefed and argued a successful motion to dismiss, on behalf of a global supplier of automotive seating systems, a $264 million patent infringement claim brought in Chapter 11 cases pending in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.</li><li>Briefed and argued a successful motion to dismiss, on behalf of provider of liquidation services, claims for equitable subordination or re-characterization of debt brought by an official committee of unsecured creditors in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.</li><li>Obtained dismissal, on behalf of an accounting firm, of a third-party complaint brought by an investment bank seeking a contribution and indemnification from a client in connection with claims for fraud brought by a bankruptcy estate in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.</li></ul><h5>Commercial Litigation</h5><ul><li>Lead trial counsel for defendants, wholly owned subsidiaries of a multinational commodity trading and mining company, in a four-day bench trial seeking declaratory judgments as to numerous property rights and contractual damages associated with the rejection of a lease to a power plant in an adversary proceeding before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas.</li><li>Lead trial counsel for plaintiff in an ICC international arbitration against a global energy company that provides equipment, services, and technology in a dispute over breach of equipment supply and construction contract.</li><li>Won a jury verdict for plaintiff, the exclusive distributor of brand-name clothing products in Latin America, suing for breach of contract for premature termination of a license agreement.</li><li>Brought successful motion to dismiss in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, on behalf of a Panamanian financial institution, of claims alleging breach of fiduciary duty and conspiracy arising from sale of an investment company.</li><li>Prevailed in motions for summary judgment and sanctions in defense of $60 million claim for fraudulent inducement and breach of contract against provider of liquidation services in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts and successfully defeated appeals from same provider before the First Circuit Court of Appeals.</li><li>Represented an accounting manager at a “Big 4” accounting firm in connection with allegations relating to the preservation of work papers in a proceeding brought by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB).</li><li>Prevailed in a motion for summary judgment defeating an accounting malpractice claim brought against a “Big 4” accounting firm.</li><li>Won motion to dismiss a state court claim while representing a “Big 4” accounting firm against allegations of malpractice in providing tax advice.</li></ul>